Identity and privilege
Review Microsoft Entra ID roles, authentication methods, guest access, application consent, lifecycle controls, and identity-risk capabilities where licensed.
Specialist Microsoft 365 security consulting
Choose the Microsoft 365 security review that matches the decision in front of you.
TenantShield provides focused, analyst-reviewed assessments for lean IT teams. Start with a broad Microsoft 365 review or go deeper on a service where risk, change, or leadership attention is already concentrated.
Choose by business question
A specialist scope when the problem is already defined.
Each engagement is shaped around the services in use, the licenses available, the evidence that can support a conclusion, and the action your team expects to take next.
Access-policy confidence
Test whether Conditional Access policies, exclusions, authentication strengths, emergency access, and deployment practices support the intended security outcomes.
Endpoint governance
Assess Microsoft Intune administration, enrollment, configuration, compliance, security policy, and operational control across the platforms in scope.
Messaging control
Review Exchange Online mail flow, forwarding, connectors, mailbox access, auditing, and built-in protections without reading ordinary mailbox content.
Email threat protection
Evaluate Microsoft Defender for Office 365 policy design, Safe Links, Safe Attachments, anti-phishing, submissions, investigation, and response features where licensed.
Tenant-wide assurance
Use the Microsoft 365 Security Audit when leadership needs a cross-service evidence review and one prioritized action register.
Buyer questions
Questions the scope should answer before access is requested.
What decision follows?
Is the work supporting a board update, customer request, insurance renewal, migration, security program, or a specific production change?
What is actually licensed?
Microsoft 365, Microsoft Entra, Microsoft Intune, Exchange Online, and Defender capabilities differ by subscription and configuration.
How deep should evidence go?
A useful scope identifies the products, populations, policy objects, logs, exceptions, and operational records required for defensible conclusions.
Assessment process
A controlled review from scope to decision.
Define the question
Confirm the decision, services, licenses, environment outline, stakeholders, exclusions, timing, and expected deliverables.
Agree the evidence plan
Document what will be reviewed, how it will be collected, which access is required, and how sensitive material will be handled.
Validate material observations
Separate configuration facts from assumptions, account for dependencies and compensating controls, and resolve context with the right owners.
Deliver priorities
Connect evidence to business impact, recommended action, ownership, dependencies, and a practical validation step.
Deliverables
Useful outputs, sized to the engagement.
- Confirmed scope, assumptions, applicable services, and evidence boundaries
- Executive summary written for the decision and stakeholders in view
- Technical findings with evidence references and confidence notes
- Prioritized action register with owners, dependencies, and validation steps
- Stakeholder readout and a record of open questions or accepted exceptions
Boundaries
Clear scope protects the quality of the answer.
- Not a penetration test, statutory audit, legal opinion, or compliance certification
- No guarantee that every security issue or future attack can be identified
- Features are reviewed only where licensed, configured, available, and included in scope
- Production changes and remediation are separately scoped and authorized
- No credentials, access tokens, or tenant exports are needed for the first conversation
Frequently asked questions
Questions to resolve before the work begins.
Should we choose a Microsoft 365-wide assessment or a specialist assessment?
Choose the Microsoft 365-wide review when the business question spans several services or the main risks are not yet clear. Choose a specialist assessment when a defined product, control family, migration, or decision needs deeper evidence.
Does an assessment include implementation?
No. Assessment conclusions remain separate from implementation. If you want help making selected changes, TenantShield can propose a separately scoped remediation engagement with approvals, safeguards, and validation steps.
Do we need to provide tenant access before discussing scope?
No. The first conversation uses your business trigger, approximate environment size, licensing, priorities, and deadline. Any later evidence or access plan is documented before collection begins.
Is the free security checker a substitute for a professional assessment?
No. The browser checker is an educational, directional tool. It does not provide the agreed scope, analyst validation, business context, evidence record, or stakeholder deliverables of a professional assessment.
Related services and evidence
Continue with the level of review that fits the question.
See the assessment format
Review an incident-informed example that clearly separates cited public facts from fictional tenant evidence.
Try the free checker
Run a directional browser-based review using delegated, read-only Microsoft Graph permissions.
Review security and data handling
Understand the boundaries for public tools, professional services, permissions, and evidence.
Start with the decision your team needs to make.
Share the business trigger, relevant Microsoft 365 licensing, approximate environment size, and decision deadline. No credentials or tenant exports are needed for the first conversation.